Sixty-two percent is a number. It does not say whether your child misread the questions, knew the method and made slips, ran out of time, or never understood the topic. Four different problems, four different fixes — and the grade looks identical for all of them.
Every question a student works through is recorded at four points, not one: whether they understood what was being asked, whether they knew the first move, whether the working held up, and whether they could prove their own answer. A student who fails at the first point and a student who fails at the third have almost nothing in common — and both of them just got the question wrong.
Alongside that: how long they spend, when they give up, which topics they avoid, whether they ask for help early or grind, and whether their own sense of how it went matches how it actually went. That last one matters more than it sounds. A student who thinks they are fine and is not will not revise.
Most feedback a student gets is a list of faults. They can usually recite what they are bad at and say nothing at all about what they are good at — which is backwards, because the thing they already do well is the thing that transfers.
The profile names both, specifically. Not "good at math" but "reads a worded question accurately and reliably picks the right first move" — because that is something to build on, and something to lean on when a topic gets hard.
The profile is not a document to file. It sets what the app puts in front of them: more of what is shaky, less of what is solid, and the specific step they keep losing marks at. A student who consistently misreads questions gets recognition training, not more algebra.
It updates as they work, so it reflects where they are now rather than where they were in September.
A plain reading of where they are strong, where they are guessing, and what to do about it — in language that does not need decoding. Enough to have a specific conversation instead of "how is school going".
The profile itself and the training that follows from it are included in the plan. The long-form written assessment — the full report you can take to a parent-teacher meeting — is the one that costs tokens.